Biden Administration Appeals Judge’s Order To Stop Expelling Migrants


The Biden administration had been up and they have been appealing a judge’s order in order to stop the use of the Trump-era pandemic policy. This is the policy that many of you are familiar with since it is actually causing right a lot of stir even when it was implemented.

The policy is the one that allows for the very rapid expulsion of migrants. The expulsion is done without giving the migrants even a single fraction of a chance to apply for asylum.

The Department of Justice had been on the grind and on this Friday they have taken the matter into their own hands and they have successfully filed an appeal of U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan.

This is going to be historic and the appeal was made to make sure that the law is going to change and that it will bar the federal government from expelling migrants in the context of and under the public health law known as Title 42.

Biden's Administration Appeals Judge's Order To Stop Expelling Migrants

The appeal that we are talking about is now known as the latest move by the Biden administration, this appeal was made in order to address the issue of the 20-year-high surge of migrants which had been going on from Mexico and Central America.

Read Also:

  1. Biden Vows To Hunt Down ISIS-K Leaders
  2. ‘Another Terror Attack in Kabul is Likely,’ National Security Chiefs Warn Biden
  3. Supreme Court Conservatives Sound Skeptical About Parts of Texas Abortion Law

There had been many crossing the border illegally. This is not a recent issue, it had been going in for quite some time. It shows that the flashpoint between the democrats and the republicans are indeed very political.

The title 42 was introduced by President Trump in the latest the year of 2020. This was done in order to get rid of the possible threat of coronavirus. The concerns were rising and at that moment the government introduced this policy.

It gave the power to the government to turn back any migrant from any place who is caught crossing the border illegally. The reason given is that they wanted to stop the spread of the coronavirus.

President Joe Biden is now making the move to roll back the hard-lined immigration policy of the predecessor. We will see what happens next and what the future holds.

Understanding the Context

To comprehend the significance of the Biden Administration’s appeal, it is essential to consider the broader context of U.S. immigration policy and the specific circumstances that led to this legal dispute.

  1. Title 42 and Pandemic-Related Expulsions:
    • Under Title 42, a public health provision invoked during the COVID-19 pandemic, the U.S. government began expelling migrants, including asylum-seekers, swiftly at the border.
    • The rationale behind Title 42 expulsions was to mitigate the spread of the virus in crowded detention facilities and border areas.
  2. Legal Challenges and Judge’s Order:
    • Advocacy groups and human rights organizations filed lawsuits challenging Title 42 expulsions, arguing that they violated both U.S. and international law.
    • In response to one such lawsuit, U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan issued an order in November 2021, ruling that the government could no longer expel migrants under Title 42 unless they posed a specific danger to public health.
  3. The Biden Administration’s Appeal:
    • Following Judge Sullivan’s order, the Biden Administration chose to appeal the decision. The appeal effectively sought to continue Title 42 expulsions while the legal battle continued.

Exploring the Legal Aspects

The Biden Administration’s appeal revolves around several legal considerations and arguments:

  1. Public Health and Title 42:
    • The administration maintains that Title 42 expulsions are essential for safeguarding public health, particularly in preventing the spread of COVID-19.
    • They argue that Judge Sullivan’s order undermines the government’s ability to respond to public health emergencies.
  2. Compliance with International Law:
    • Critics of Title 42 expulsions argue that they violate U.S. obligations under international law, including the principle of non-refoulement, which prohibits sending individuals back to countries where they may face persecution.
    • The Biden Administration must grapple with these international legal concerns in its appeal.
  3. Balancing Public Health and Asylum Rights:
    • The legal dispute raises complex questions about striking a balance between public health interests and the rights of migrants, including their right to seek asylum.
  4. The Role of Congress:
    • Some argue that the solution to this issue lies with Congress, which has the power to amend or replace Title 42 with legislation that addresses the public health concerns while respecting asylum rights.

Broader Implications

The Biden Administration’s appeal carries several significant implications:

  1. Immigration Policy Debate:
    • This legal battle highlights the ongoing debate surrounding U.S. immigration policy, the treatment of migrants, and the government’s responsibility to uphold both public health and human rights.
  2. International Reputation:
    • The United States’ response to immigration issues, especially those involving asylum-seekers, has international repercussions. How the country balances these concerns can affect its global reputation.
  3. Legal Precedent:
    • The outcome of this appeal may set a legal precedent for future cases involving the intersection of public health measures and immigration rights.
  4. Humanitarian Concerns:
    • Advocates for migrants and asylum-seekers are closely monitoring this case, emphasizing the humanitarian aspect and the need to uphold international legal principles.

Read Also:

  1. Political Crisis in Italy?
  2. India Slams UK’s New Travel Rules
  3. Britain Faces Gas Crisis, Labour Shortage and Supply Chain Chaos


The Biden Administration’s decision to appeal a judge’s order to halt the expulsion of migrants under Title 42 reflects the complex and multifaceted nature of immigration policy in the United States.

Balancing public health concerns with the rights and humanitarian needs of migrants is an ongoing challenge.

This legal battle serves as a microcosm of the broader debate on immigration policy, raising questions about international law, human rights, and the government’s responsibilities in times of crisis.

The outcome of this appeal will undoubtedly impact the future of U.S. immigration policy and set important precedents for similar cases.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here